1962: SAVE the BAY AREA from CHOKING to DEATH (with BART)!
My favorite bit from this scan of an original flyer in support of Proposition "A": "All statements in this leaflet are accurate and factual." That reassuring disclaimer apparently made this passage adequately persuasive:
Who endorsed Proposition "A"? Taxpayer's groups... labor... doctors, lawyers, merchants, housewives, educators, Republicans, Democrats - everybody who wants a prosperous Bay Area. Opposition? Scattered, local, self-interested.
Indeeeed. The proposition required a district-wide 60% "yes" to pass; it got 61.2%, with the help of folks who cynically voted for it even though they wanted, and expected, it to fail. More after the jump...
As johnny0 over at Burrito Justice put it, "I’m constantly amazed that BART got built at all given the 50s freeway push."
One thing is for sure. There's no way something of that size and complexity could ever pass today. No matter how much you loathe BART for fare increases, declining service, and perpetual deficits - and I've probably got you all beat on the hate front - we almost ended up with nothing at all. It's hard to imagine how that would have been better for San Francisco.
BART's own website, after telling about the retreat of Marin and San Mateo counties from the plan, puts it like this:
The total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million. It would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry.
After the election, engineers immediately started work on the final system designs, only to be halted by a taxpayer's suit filed against the District a month later. The validity of the bond election, and the legality of the District itself, were challenged. While the court ruled in favor of the District on both counts, six months of litigation cost $12 million in construction delays. This would be the first of many delays from litigation and time-consuming negotiations involving 166 separate agreements reached with on-line cities, counties, and other special districts. The democratic processes of building a new transit system would prove to be major cost factors that, however necessary, were not foreseen.
Related book: Historic Photos of San Francisco
From Amazon
From Powell's
Follow…
Original Videos
Recent Posts
- Fire at Little Baobab
- This Mind Blowing Video Does NOT Use Green Screen
- Aerial Outtakes of Ken Block Tearing Up San Francisco
- Gonzo Road Trip Rally
- Zoom Around a Leveled San Francisco
- Drive Across Mongolia in 4 Minutes (video)
- This is #cappstreet on Instagram
- Horatio’s Legacy
- Urban Tree to Bicycle
- Someone You Know is a Sex Worker
- Quick Time Lapse from Turkey
- The Road to Mongolia
- San Francisco to Mongolia – a Road Trip
- This Woman Dares You to Give Her an Orgasm
- Time Lapse of Undulating Flowers
Archives
Categories
- Art
- Booze
- Creeks
- Drugs
- Events
- Food
- Hikes in the City
- History
- Humor
- I Love SF
- Infiltrations
- Just Photos
- Maps
- Mass Transit
- Name That Spot
- Not San Francisco
- Parks
- Politics
- Quake
- Spots Explored
- Tech
- The Mission
- Uncategorized
- Urban Wildlife
- Video
- Visitors
- Watershed
Check These: Blogs
- 10 Zen Monkeys
- Burrito Justice
- California's Islands
- Eye on Blogs
- Gianni's North Beach
- Golden Gate Beer Blog
- Haighteration
- Laughing Squid
- Mission Mission
- Muni Diaries
- Olde Nasty
- San Francisco Appreciation Society
- Sexpigeon
- SF Sewers
- Sunnyside Herald
- Tenderblog
- Wolf! Not Wolf
Check These: Other Sites
- CounterPULSE
- Daniel Jarvis
- David Rumsey Historical Maps
- FoundSF
- H Plus
- I Live Here
- Nature in the City
- ParkScan
- Secret San Francisco
- SF City Guides
- SFPD Scanner
- Th!nkWalks



November 10th, 2009 - 21:39
I would have voted against BART in 62, if I had been alive and living in the Bay Area. The arguments would not have convinced me at all. Thank god the people here at the time voted for it.